#Spyder 3 pro vs elite serial number
Below this was a sticker containing the device’s serial number to install the software.ĭatacolor says that the SpyderX has been completely redesigned from the ground up, so I thought I’d see how it looked side-by-side against my Spyder5 Elite. Then, obviously, there was the SpyderX Elite unit itself, packed in a plastic vacuum formed cavity with a neatly wound and velcro strapped USB cable.
#Spyder 3 pro vs elite software
There’s a card insert telling me where to download the SpyderX software and where I could find support. On opening up the box, the contents were pretty sparse. After all, the press release they sent to me made some pretty bold claims about colour accuracy, speed and ease of use. When Datacolor reached out to me recently and asked if I’d like to give the new super SpyderX Elite a try, I thought, “sure, why not?”.
#Spyder 3 pro vs elite drivers
It didn’t seem to like my Nvidia graphics drivers at all. I could run it over and over on the same system, and I’d get different colours every time.
While some users seemed to be having some measure of success with the Spyder5, every time I ran the calibration I’d get very different results to the previous run. Surely they’ve got this calibration thing figured out by now, right? That would be another no. So, I bought my own i1 Display 2 and stuck with it until last year, when I got the Spyder5 Elite. But when I used the i1 Display 2, the files coming up on my screen that I’d sent to the lab were near identical to the prints I was holding in my hand. The Spyder3 Elite also didn’t seem to reflect the colours of the prints in the “calibrated” monitor. My colours changed massively again with each. So I borrowed a friend’s i1 Display 2 and a Spyder3 Elite and calibrated with those to compare. So, now it’s perfect, right? Well, not really, no.Īfter making an order at a rather respectable UK print lab, the colours were way off from what they were supposed to be. I thought “Wow, look at that difference! My screen must have been way off!”. A little less expensive than the higher end models, and it only supported a single monitor, but it was supposedly just as accurate.Īfter installing the software and letting it do its magic, my monitor’s colours changed drastically. My introduction to monitor calibration devices was when the Spyder2 was supposed to be the pinnacle of monitor calibration technology. My history with Spyder calibration device hasn’t been that great. I feel like this needs a short explanation so you can see where I’m coming from, why my expectations weren’t very high for the SpyderX Elite, and why there might be some surprise in my tone later on in this review. And that’s where devices like the SpyderX Elite come into play. Monitor calibration deals with all of these issues by ensuring that your monitor is showing the colours that your software (like Photoshop) thinks it is. So, when you calibrate your screen and edit your colours accurately, when it pops up on their screen, to their eyes and brain, it’ll look right.įor compositing, you also need accurate colours to ensure that you can better match colours between different elements of your composition.
And while calibrating your monitor won’t help other peoples screens, their eyes and brains are used to how “normal” colours look on their screens. The colour and contrast can be way off from how you perceived it on your monitor.Įven if you’re only going to be posting your photographs online, when others see your image, they may see strange colour casts because their uncalibrated monitors are off in a different direction. If your monitor isn’t displaying the correct colours, then you don’t really know how your adjustments are affecting the image, and when you get your prints back from the lab, they’re not going to look the way you thought they would. What’s the big deal with monitor calibration?Īs mentioned, the whole point of calibrating your monitors is to help ensure accurate and consistent colours throughout your photography workflow.
0 kommentar(er)
